From owner-svn-ports-all@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 23 18:47:15 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1033) id 20D94695; Mon, 23 Jun 2014 18:47:15 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2014 18:47:15 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev To: Eitan Adler Subject: Re: svn commit: r358722 - head/Mk Message-ID: <20140623184715.GB55530@FreeBSD.org> References: <201406211708.s5LH8ZvE087036@svn.freebsd.org> <20140623124533.GP23976@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <20140623165459.GR23976@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Cc: Mathieu Arnold , svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, Baptiste Daroussin , svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2014 18:47:15 -0000 On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 11:30:24AM -0700, Eitan Adler wrote: > What value does portmgr add here over a peer review? What is the risk here? Precisely my point. These descs do not affect package building. I don't see the need for any portmgr@ intervention. ./danfe