Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2004 20:34:35 +0100 From: Pav Lucistnik <pav@FreeBSD.org> To: Ion-Mihai Tetcu <itetcu@people.tecnik93.com> Cc: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/75551: [PATCH] Correct a 'post-patch' entry inthing. Message-ID: <1104262475.48118.17.camel@hood.oook.cz> In-Reply-To: <20041228213109.6ed4e952@it.buh.tecnik93.com> References: <200412281659.iBSGxciD076228@freefall.freebsd.org> <20041228211134.056bb9b3@it.buh.tecnik93.com> <1104261378.48118.11.camel@hood.oook.cz> <20041228213109.6ed4e952@it.buh.tecnik93.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--=-Ju7JHBWOFGvhAzccaZdT
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Ion-Mihai Tetcu p=ED=B9e v =FAt 28. 12. 2004 v 21:31 +0200:
> > Second, I fear that those PRs would be forgotten in analyzed state once
> > the port is updated and the matter settled. So I rather closed them.
>=20
> I try not to forget to say about the PRs that should be closed when my
> PRs supersede them.
Fair, I should have been more involved and track these PRs instead of
closing them. My apology.
> > > > (Bottom line here is that you should approach maintainer directly,
> > > > without the detour via send-pr)
> > >=20
> > > For two stylistic ones yes, but for the dir permissions (75549) and
> > > "UntrustedDeliveryAgent" and "QuarantineAgent (75548), I tend to
> > > believe a pr is OK.
> >=20
> > Always, always, always, when there is an active maintainer around,
> > direct contact with a maintainer is strongly preferred.
> >=20
> > It's really an ugly habit to send-pr patch and Cc maintainer.
>=20
> Better that send pr and not cc the maintainer, anyway.
Yes that's worst variant.
> > First, a lot of maintainers don't know how to act properly on such
> > emails, they just don't Cc their replies back to GNATS.
>=20
> I think the problem is that the subj, must begin with
> FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org or else it becomes a 'misfiled' reply.
> Only cc'ing seems not to be enough.
The trick is to leave Re: ports/XXXXX: at the beginning of the subject.
--=20
Pav Lucistnik <pav@oook.cz>
<pav@FreeBSD.org>
What luck - a dagger! This is your holder. Rest there and let me die.
--=-Ju7JHBWOFGvhAzccaZdT
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: Toto je =?iso-8859-2?Q?digit=E1ln=EC?=
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?_podepsan=E1?= =?iso-8859-2?Q?_=E8=E1st?=
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?_zpr=E1vy?=
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD)
iD8DBQBB0bVLntdYP8FOsoIRAi2WAJ4wtzRTGljXv0PZD977UJtHkuuPxwCfWrXJ
KyV2UoDsI25/2sZKaea2jl4=
=wDD9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-Ju7JHBWOFGvhAzccaZdT--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1104262475.48118.17.camel>