From owner-freebsd-current Sun Sep 2 18:23:45 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from wall.polstra.com (rtrwan160.accessone.com [206.213.115.74]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A60CF37B405 for ; Sun, 2 Sep 2001 18:23:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from vashon.polstra.com (vashon.polstra.com [206.213.73.13]) by wall.polstra.com (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f831Ndg19931; Sun, 2 Sep 2001 18:23:39 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jdp@wall.polstra.com) Received: (from jdp@localhost) by vashon.polstra.com (8.11.6/8.11.0) id f831Nda00552; Sun, 2 Sep 2001 18:23:39 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jdp) Date: Sun, 2 Sep 2001 18:23:39 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200109030123.f831Nda00552@vashon.polstra.com> To: current@freebsd.org From: John Polstra Cc: gersh@sonn.com Subject: Re: MALLOC/FREE macro useage. In-Reply-To: References: Organization: Polstra & Co., Seattle, WA Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In article , Gersh wrote: > sys/malloc.h says that the macro versions of MALLOC/FREE are > deprecated however they are used all over the place. I belive that they > are cluttering and dont really have a purpose. Does anybody else agree? > > If I were to make up a patch for current removing all of them would > anybody care enough to commit it (Or care enough to not have it commited) Please don't. It would just create a bunch of new gratuitous differences against the other BSDs. John -- John Polstra jdp@polstra.com John D. Polstra & Co., Inc. Seattle, Washington USA "Disappointment is a good sign of basic intelligence." -- Chögyam Trungpa To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message