Date: Wed, 6 May 2020 10:23:42 -0500 From: Tim Daneliuk <tundra@tundraware.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: redesignde the unix-like system directory Message-ID: <c3f5a607-760d-8a85-c0f3-e72ee6b9a3dc@tundraware.com> In-Reply-To: <20200506151230.GI82984@trajan.stk.cx> References: <83788746a7d8a802d8af4b582e00827166febd1a.camel@tom.com> <CAEJNuHzCcqR0-v_SEPT4QWai1owzL_41M-YN3fTS_YGHN0jwFg@mail.gmail.com> <9a387b42-8da5-2968-24ba-754c3e461252@kicp.uchicago.edu> <20200506151230.GI82984@trajan.stk.cx>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 5/6/20 10:12 AM, Arne Steinkamm wrote: > Looking at a flat layout like this one gives me a feeling, that > most people forgot that it's a real bad idea to have a > external mounted directory in the root directory... easy way to make > a system unresponsive in case of a network problem. > Can you say a bit more about why this is so? > I keep the traditional filesystem layout +1 -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Tim Daneliuk tundra@tundraware.com PGP Key: http://www.tundraware.com/PGP/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?c3f5a607-760d-8a85-c0f3-e72ee6b9a3dc>