Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 07 May 2014 11:06:31 -0400
From:      Lowell Gilbert <freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org>
To:        "edflecko ." <edflecko@gmail.com>
Cc:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: pkg audit disagrees with pkg upgrade ???
Message-ID:  <44d2fp8w7c.fsf@lowell-desk.lan>
In-Reply-To: <CAFS4T6bWioVcjGNtCsxZgwxgnfavLdTPGvVUdcJPc=r%2Bi7%2BQJg@mail.gmail.com> (edflecko .'s message of "Wed, 7 May 2014 07:51:22 -0700")
References:  <CAFS4T6ZTGERL3a6DmkAhHMLG2C%2BNT6hbA--dgwwQZo9Gux_ogg@mail.gmail.com> <5369DF16.40000@qeng-ho.org> <CAFS4T6bWioVcjGNtCsxZgwxgnfavLdTPGvVUdcJPc=r%2Bi7%2BQJg@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Don't top-post, please.

"edflecko ." <edflecko@gmail.com> writes:

> On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 12:21 AM, Arthur Chance <freebsd@qeng-ho.org> wrote:
>
>> On 06/05/2014 21:27, edflecko . wrote:
>>
>>> I'm checking to see if I need to upgrade any installed packages. pkg audit
>>> -F says I have three vulnerabilities, but when I run pkg upgrade -y, it
>>> thinks everything is O.K. (see below)
>>>
>>> Why the discrepancy? Which one should I believe?
>>>
>>
>> Apples and oranges. Just because a port has a vulnerability doesn't
>> necessarily mean there's a newer version available yet.

> Great, thank you.
>
> Is there a way to see what package(s) is specifically using these dependent
> packages? I might choose to remove the host package, for security reasons,
> and thereby remove these as well.

Sure. "pkg info -r <package-name>". See "man pkg-info" for details.

Or, sometimes, I just try to "pkg delete" the package, and (if it's
still a dependency) I'll get an error message that tells me what depends
on it.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?44d2fp8w7c.fsf>