From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 10 04:26:52 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E8D216A4CE; Wed, 10 Mar 2004 04:26:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from abigail.blackend.org (blackend.org [212.11.35.229]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 898A343D46; Wed, 10 Mar 2004 04:26:51 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from marc@blackend.org) Received: from abigail.blackend.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by abigail.blackend.org (8.12.9/8.12.3) with ESMTP id i2ACQkrZ004227; Wed, 10 Mar 2004 13:26:48 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from marc@abigail.blackend.org) Received: (from marc@localhost) by abigail.blackend.org (8.12.9/8.12.3/Submit) id i2ACQhSJ004226; Wed, 10 Mar 2004 13:26:43 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from marc) Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 13:26:42 +0100 From: Marc Fonvieille To: Poul-Henning Kamp Message-ID: <20040310122641.GB1241@abigail.blackend.org> References: <20040310113611.GA1241@abigail.blackend.org> <40928.1078919852@critter.freebsd.dk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <40928.1078919852@critter.freebsd.dk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Useless-Header: blackend.org X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 4.8-STABLE cc: current@freebsd.org cc: small@freebsd.org Subject: Re: "nanobsd" prototype X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 12:26:52 -0000 On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 12:57:32PM +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > > > >It'd be great to be able to choose, via a parameter, between a 3 slices > >version and a 2 slices one. Or one should trim down the installed > >images, a 128MB CF card should be the minimal media size. > >Well I know 256MB will be less expensive in future, and since I'm still > >using 8MB cards on the 4501, I must be an outdated guy :)) > > Not long ago I manually cut down a -current to run in 32MB but I > admit that there were a fair bit of stuff missing :-) > My previous mail was not really correct: the 8MB cards use picobsd which is different from your nanobsd (the difference is not 10E-3 ;) but the nanobsd name is really well-chosen). Marc