From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon Mar 4 9:21:52 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mailgw3a.lmco.com (mailgw3a.lmco.com [192.35.35.24]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B29A37B41A for ; Mon, 4 Mar 2002 09:21:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from emss01g01.ems.lmco.com ([129.197.181.54]) by mailgw3a.lmco.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g24HLlo30303 for ; Mon, 4 Mar 2002 12:21:47 -0500 (EST) Received: from CONVERSION-DAEMON by lmco.com (PMDF V5.2-33 #38886) id <0GSG00D01LJ5NA@lmco.com> for freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org; Mon, 4 Mar 2002 09:21:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from BSDWIN2KKOROUSH ([129.197.23.48]) by lmco.com (PMDF V5.2-33 #38886) with SMTP id <0GSG00B0JLJ1JJ@lmco.com> for freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org; Mon, 04 Mar 2002 09:21:01 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 04 Mar 2002 09:20:49 -0800 From: Koroush Saraf Subject: Routing question, Routed using one interface (more info) To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Message-id: <009501c1c3a0$ee1d3600$3017c581@BSDWIN2KKOROUSH> MIME-version: 1.0 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4807.1700 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4807.1700 Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-priority: Normal Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > I'm making a new post to attach the network diagram in order to clarify my > question. (fixed point font please) > > I have several bsd4.3 computers each with one NIC on a shared LAN as below: > > +-------------+ > |10.1.1.1/24 | > | +--+ > | | | > +-------------+ | > | > +-------------+ | > |10.1.1.2/24 | | > |10.2.2.2/24 +--+ > | | | > +-------------+ | > | > +-------------+ | > |10.2.2.3/24 | | > |10.3.3.3/24 +--+ > | | | > +-------------+ | > | > +-------------+ | > |10.3.3.4/24 | | > | +--+ > | | > +-------------+ > > Now I like to turn on Routed, and have the approperiate routes discovered. > Then from the 10.1.1.1 computer I like to be able to run traceroute to the > 10.3.3.4 computer and see the following: > 10.1.1.1 <-> 10.1.1.2 <->10.2.2.3<->10.3.3.4 > currently I've tried this, but the routing is not being discovered and the > routing table remains unchanged. There are no default routes either. > Can you tell me if this is possible? and if so what I need to do to get it > to work? > > > > > Hi All, > > I like to know why when I turn on ROUTED on my machines they don't > discover > > the attached subnets to the link. The scenario is below: > > > > I' have several bsd computers each with one network card. All the > computers > > sit on a shared Ethernet. I like to perform some routing simulations > > comparing ospf and rip. So I have setup the computers so that each NIC > has > > several IP address aliases assigned. When I turn on ROUTED I see a few > > hello packets exchanged and very so often I see an IGMP multicast for the > > router discovery protocol. However, the routing tables remain as they > were > > before I turnon ROUTED. So basically the aliased NIC IP addresses are not > > being advertised. Can you tell me how I can make routing work through > these > > aliased addresses? > > Also I have addressed my computers in the 10.x.x.x range which is the > > private IP address range and not internet routable. Does ROUTED care > about > > the range of addresses in use or all IP addresses are using in the routing > > table as valid routable addresses. Just wanted to make sure this wasn't > my > > problem. > > Thanks in advance for taking the time to suggest solution, > > ~Koroush Saraf > > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > > with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message