Date: Tue, 2 Nov 1999 13:41:52 +0100 From: Manuel Bouyer <bouyer@antioche.lip6.fr> To: Terry Lambert <tlambert@primenet.com> Cc: "Kenneth D. Merry" <ken@kdm.org>, don@calis.blacksun.org, ticso@cicely.de, grog@lemis.com, bright@wintelcom.net, freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Journaling Message-ID: <19991102134152.A18969@antioche.lip6.fr> In-Reply-To: <199910291710.KAA16646@usr02.primenet.com>; from Terry Lambert on Fri, Oct 29, 1999 at 05:10:14PM %2B0000 References: <199910280305.VAA13281@panzer.kdm.org> <199910291710.KAA16646@usr02.primenet.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Oct 29, 1999 at 05:10:14PM +0000, Terry Lambert wrote: > NetBSD currently supports 16. > > Yes, it breaks backward compatability. No, NetBSD supports 16 only on ports that started with 16. Other still are 8. There are discussions about how to move to a higther number (not 16, but at last 64 or more) without breacking backward compatability ... -- Manuel Bouyer, LIP6, Universite Paris VI. Manuel.Bouyer@lip6.fr -- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-fs" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19991102134152.A18969>