From nobody Sun Aug 24 15:35:24 2025 X-Original-To: freebsd-current@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4c8yg30n1rz65d5G for ; Sun, 24 Aug 2025 15:35:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from void@f-m.fm) Received: from fhigh-a3-smtp.messagingengine.com (fhigh-a3-smtp.messagingengine.com [103.168.172.154]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4c8yg248t9z3lWw for ; Sun, 24 Aug 2025 15:35:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from void@f-m.fm) Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=f-m.fm header.s=fm3 header.b=oEL6lDc7; dkim=pass header.d=messagingengine.com header.s=fm3 header.b=ONl78IJQ; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=f-m.fm; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of void@f-m.fm designates 103.168.172.154 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=void@f-m.fm Received: from phl-compute-01.internal (phl-compute-01.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailfhigh.phl.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C3D314000BA for ; Sun, 24 Aug 2025 11:35:26 -0400 (EDT) Received: from phl-mailfrontend-02 ([10.202.2.163]) by phl-compute-01.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 24 Aug 2025 11:35:26 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=f-m.fm; h=cc :content-type:content-type:date:date:from:from:in-reply-to :in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject :subject:to:to; s=fm3; t=1756049726; x=1756136126; bh=3iO7906Joh 0V4lRCVq/3wrCdEGWwoM4DC2Po4SBzcr0=; b=oEL6lDc7KNb+K2ygqmIYRfqT56 afyfdCKJGh/rTBXpFGxCKoFmMKP2qd7mQk4YKm+wbsTc75jc1hYS6Xx0xM340dp6 d2LM8uinJnJdOrA4qkwhFBTgi+lMMlNHnNe4rusjIh1RxO/KTgsJ96xlkm5jGo72 srR5bduppvW/l1N4j6Auuuy44JGF8aqX1UhUZ0UUyRf3JSlMfxn1mXcH4gKNqSdB Tkrz6JmECkgQpjlGBDBN90tMxlMPXS8/3hUsEUMGzzpuNc9bunz7/7yUzV4PKsDc iYb4Uxy4P9rqVZd30x45N7W04oj1ZyB9As0IbrUYBcEKova2Km58GTwa4XeA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:content-type:date:date :feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject:subject:to :to:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; t= 1756049726; x=1756136126; bh=3iO7906Joh0V4lRCVq/3wrCdEGWwoM4DC2P o4SBzcr0=; b=ONl78IJQZUQB9WuYE7RUyGjNZiTaCqSAjHdL+x50VaUpZH+MUh6 +vwlSa0zh7SWVFFVSi8AEpdV2ZyAkxOTNHJwpMMgFuy7v0iZY1FhgWJRXIK92T4W Op5p9H2p7B322r+TeMg++YD7zUMJU3PWH/aVCLvzHrVAXeUCR1Ewi64KjFMUt+od U1rs894EUblEZrbtpsiq1vx2MN+Q1MzUbHpq4a6kBn6y9HbCQ2AX8NH3nYgRA+1j 21mIsrAXOjF5KMU6scZEDKH0XMWsFLT9R72T+MeBJSSWUXRNGIhB2K9PhYqyf+EP kG90DQk75QswIKfM9bbx8fxssiFZmhdgvtw== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeeffedrtdefgdduieelkeelucetufdoteggodetrf dotffvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgenuceu rghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpeffhffvuffkfhggtggujgesthdtrodttd dtvdenucfhrhhomhepvhhoihguuceovhhoihgusehfqdhmrdhfmheqnecuggftrfgrthht vghrnhepieevgfefgeffhffggfeitdejjefhteeffefgleefieevleevjeeuiedugeelgf fgnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepvhho ihgusehfqdhmrdhfmhdpnhgspghrtghpthhtohepuddpmhhouggvpehsmhhtphhouhhtpd hrtghpthhtohepfhhrvggvsghsugdqtghurhhrvghnthesfhhrvggvsghsugdrohhrgh X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: i2541463c:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA for ; Sun, 24 Aug 2025 11:35:25 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2025 16:35:24 +0100 From: void To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: is COMPAT_FREEBSD11 still required for riscv64, in order to build rustc? Message-ID: Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org References: List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-current List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Spamd-Bar: -- X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.59 / 15.00]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.99)[-0.992]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[f-m.fm,none]; MID_RHS_NOT_FQDN(0.50)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:103.168.172.128/27:c]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[f-m.fm:s=fm3,messagingengine.com:s=fm3]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[103.168.172.154:from]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[f-m.fm]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[f-m.fm]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-current@freebsd.org]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[f-m.fm:+,messagingengine.com:+]; MLMMJ_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-current@freebsd.org]; ASN(0.00)[asn:151847, ipnet:103.168.172.0/24, country:AU]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; MISSING_XM_UA(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[messagingengine.com:dkim] X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4c8yg248t9z3lWw On Sun, Aug 24, 2025 at 08:57:05AM -0600, Warner Losh wrote: >I thought they'd finally landed the pull request that made this required. A >trivial rust program would tell you since the holdup was integrating the >ino64 system calls and that touched everything. ok, thanks. I'll post results here. The GENERIC-NODEBUG kernel doesn't ship with COMPAT_FREEBSD11 --