From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 16 09:47:01 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 282E81065674 for ; Tue, 16 Jun 2009 09:47:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-current@m.gmane.org) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6B678FC18 for ; Tue, 16 Jun 2009 09:47:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-current@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1MGVFr-0000q3-RA for freebsd-current@freebsd.org; Tue, 16 Jun 2009 09:46:59 +0000 Received: from lara.cc.fer.hr ([161.53.72.113]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 16 Jun 2009 09:46:59 +0000 Received: from ivoras by lara.cc.fer.hr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 16 Jun 2009 09:46:59 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org From: Ivan Voras Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 11:46:49 +0200 Lines: 30 Message-ID: References: <4A370DB2.8070403@wanderview.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: lara.cc.fer.hr User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (X11/20090615) In-Reply-To: <4A370DB2.8070403@wanderview.com> Sender: news Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: tmpfs experimental? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 09:47:01 -0000 Ben Kelly wrote: > Ivan Voras wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Are there still known problems with tmpfs? >> >> I've been using it for a while in 7-STABLE and 8-CURRENT without >> noticeable problems - not that there was ever serious load involved >> (normal /tmp activity). I've just tried it and it survived a couple of >> rounds of blogbench, even with virtual memory swapping. >> >> In other words, is there still reason for the "highly experimental >> feature" warning? > > I get some slightly unexpected behavior when mount is run > multiple times: > > ianto# mount | grep ' /tmp' > tmpfs on /tmp (tmpfs, local) > ianto# mount /tmp > ianto# mount | grep ' /tmp' > tmpfs on /tmp (tmpfs, local) > tmpfs on /tmp (tmpfs, local) > ianto# umount /tmp > ianto# mount | grep ' /tmp' > tmpfs on /tmp (tmpfs, local) Sorry, maybe I'm missing the point, but what is wrong with the above behaviour? AFAIK you are allowed to mount multiple file systems on the same directory, though it isn't very useful.