From owner-freebsd-stable Fri May 11 15:19:24 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from warez.scriptkiddie.org (uswest-dsl-142-38.cortland.com [209.162.142.38]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77BD537B424 for ; Fri, 11 May 2001 15:19:22 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from lamont@scriptkiddie.org) Received: from warez.scriptkiddie.org (warez.scriptkiddie.org [209.162.142.38]) by warez.scriptkiddie.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A861262D01 for ; Fri, 11 May 2001 15:19:21 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 11 May 2001 15:19:21 -0700 (PDT) From: Lamont Granquist To: Subject: fat32 slower than dogshit? In-Reply-To: <061901c0da66$8da39040$931576d8@inethouston.net> Message-ID: <20010511151056.J15049-100000@warez.scriptkiddie.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Well, i think it is, i'm actually not too sure exactly how fast dogshit is in the first place. But in doing a simple untar on a fat32 partition using both 4-stable a couple days after release and a recently updated 4-stable as of yesterday (5/10) it goes about 20-30 times slower than an untar on a UFS partition. Now i know fat32 is supposed to be slower than UFS, but this seems a little bit rediculous. Does this sound like a known problem? If someone wants more information I can probably dig down and get it if I know what you want... To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message