From owner-freebsd-ruby@freebsd.org Sun Jul 12 19:52:39 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ruby@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7955199B7C5 for ; Sun, 12 Jul 2015 19:52:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pgollucci@p6m7g8.com) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57C1D1638 for ; Sun, 12 Jul 2015 19:52:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pgollucci@p6m7g8.com) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 56DEC99B7C4; Sun, 12 Jul 2015 19:52:39 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ruby@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 565D399B7C3 for ; Sun, 12 Jul 2015 19:52:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pgollucci@p6m7g8.com) Received: from mail-ig0-f173.google.com (mail-ig0-f173.google.com [209.85.213.173]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2A19B1637 for ; Sun, 12 Jul 2015 19:52:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pgollucci@p6m7g8.com) Received: by iggf3 with SMTP id f3so7819559igg.1 for ; Sun, 12 Jul 2015 12:52:32 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=YVDQqBvoW6l44Af4b3iqe17YJle8fP/GBOE2VGXpnf4=; b=TXhu1Zg4DQ0F5kBRSANPMe9XheECqIl/sv/G9lNvD4JXqG6FviA36jSQm3YBXF/pm8 Ex7XR76d35Vj0Nw7IU/WJQVNj2GkUQZLIyKhG1JlQkbeyFvY0ybNQMv4WUeREh2JpuI2 cvlUnx4uG+xBUYB4oixyPpa4G80SVNwaV5otblV4ucADukoTyS/tRcle70RGMIeOXKjH moHgnNlIQWio2FbQ5UDa8jTeP7STQkc9naWfGgqqkEKJ3uq0bH06CeoKcv1TiH7hrKXv e1tvRR1ak3jPWI3FmVTRQVnE+WuxOMycddkB4/dgBsJ3pDVVcmd4Yn5A2DPYL9TPkoNg WfVw== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQm0QzjbNn/f9Y73iX4qhHNlTSVd0Ss9EhzmtqXj8pb8E6G3qH3BqJkXlfn+AjIGTOoUMRXr X-Received: by 10.50.61.241 with SMTP id t17mr9101951igr.34.1436730752287; Sun, 12 Jul 2015 12:52:32 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.50.195.199 with HTTP; Sun, 12 Jul 2015 12:51:52 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [68.101.40.130] In-Reply-To: <55A2A5E8.9070703@toco-domains.de> References: <55A2A5E8.9070703@toco-domains.de> From: "Philip M. Gollucci" Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2015 15:51:52 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [Gitlab] Call for help / ideas To: =?UTF-8?Q?Torsten_Z=C3=BChlsdorff?= Cc: ruby@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.20 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ruby@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD-specific Ruby discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2015 19:52:39 -0000 rails has 58 gem port dependencies. Its possible you'd need 59 new ports (though unlikely). I suspect about 27 are likely to be incompatible. I would definitely prefer option #2. On Sun, Jul 12, 2015 at 1:37 PM, Torsten Z=C3=BChlsdorff wrote: > Hello, > > the work at gitlab stucks at a bug. When installing gitlab i got this > error: > > =3D=3D=3D Start =3D=3D=3D > > Adding limits to schema.rb for mysql > > =3D=3D Seed from /usr/local/www/gitlab/db/fixtures/production/001_admin.r= b > rake aborted! > can't modify frozen ActiveSupport::HashWithIndifferentAccess > > =3D=3D=3D End =3D=3D=3D > > After research this has 2 reasons. First: mysql is not used. Therefore it= s > an error to try installing a scheme for it ;) > Second: gitlab is based at Rails 4.1.11, while we provide 4.2 in the > ports-tree. When using 4.1.x the installation went fine. The behavior of > activerecord changed between 4.1 and 4.2. > > Now i have to choices: > - adding rails 4.1 ports just for gitlab (and drop them when no longer > needed) > - patching gitlab to run which rails 4.2 > > I personally think the second option is the best seen in long term. But i > have just a limited amount of time, gitlab is huge and i don't believe it= s > a good idea to do this without the gitlab team. Therefore this will take > long. > > The first idea seems dirty. But on the other hand there are already a > bunch of ports added (and some more needed) just for gitlab. > > But you are the guys which the most experience: what should we do? Or do > you have more ideas? > > Thanks for your help, > Torsten > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ruby@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ruby > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ruby-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > --=20 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------= ------ Curb: Your ride is here 4096R/D21D2752 ECDF B= 597 B54B 7F92 753E E0EA F699 A450 D21D 2752 Philip M. Gollucci (pgollucci@p6m7g8.com) c: 703.336.9354 Member, Apache Software Foundation Committer, FreeBSD Foundation Consultant, P6M7G8 Inc. Sr. Director IT Operations, Curb What doesn't kill us can only make us stronger; Except it almost kills you.