From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 23 23:16:26 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C415106566C; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 23:16:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gerald@pfeifer.com) Received: from vexpert.dbai.tuwien.ac.at (vexpert.dbai.tuwien.ac.at [128.131.111.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F3CF8FC18; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 23:16:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gerald@pfeifer.com) Received: from acrux.dbai.tuwien.ac.at (acrux [128.131.111.60]) by vexpert.dbai.tuwien.ac.at (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8941A39106; Fri, 24 Jul 2009 01:16:24 +0200 (CEST) Received: by acrux.dbai.tuwien.ac.at (Postfix, from userid 1203) id 15EFB1005D; Fri, 24 Jul 2009 01:16:28 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by acrux.dbai.tuwien.ac.at (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEF9F10059; Fri, 24 Jul 2009 01:16:28 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2009 01:16:28 +0200 (CEST) From: Gerald Pfeifer To: Maho NAKATA In-Reply-To: <20090723.100400.623571555980913508.chat95@mac.com> Message-ID: References: <200907220819.n6M8J1ls085484@repoman.freebsd.org> <20090722104843.4C7C539843@qat.tcbug.org> <20090723.100400.623571555980913508.chat95@mac.com> User-Agent: Alpine 1.99 (LSU 1142 2008-08-13) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org, QAT@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, openoffice@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/editors/openoffice.org-3-RC Makefile distinfo ports/editors/openoffice.org-3-RC/files patch-i102679 X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: **OBSOLETE** CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2009 23:16:27 -0000 On Thu, 23 Jul 2009, Maho NAKATA wrote: > Hi, * (add Gerald, a gcc guru) You are being kind, Maho-san. :-) > I investigated a bit and this is a bug of gcc. I looked into the log, and understand this is our system compiler. My recommendation is to see whether this also occurs with lang/gcc42 (that is, setting USE_GCC=4.2 in the port), lang/gcc43, or lang/gcc44. This may be a very valid case where going for the ports compiler, a recommendation I have heard from obrien and others, sounds like a good idea and as you have seen I have started to push to get things cleaned up for lang/gcc44 even. If lang/gcc44 works for you, GCC 4.4.1 has just been released upstream and I would hope this to be a longer term solution; otherwise lang/gcc43. Gerald