From owner-svn-src-all@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 12 18:48:15 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5FD9351A; Wed, 12 Feb 2014 18:48:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from theravensnest.org (theraven.freebsd.your.org [216.14.102.27]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 25AB31183; Wed, 12 Feb 2014 18:48:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.7] (cpc28-cmbg15-2-0-cust64.5-4.cable.virginm.net [86.27.189.65]) (authenticated bits=0) by theravensnest.org (8.14.7/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s1CIm2Fl042705 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Wed, 12 Feb 2014 18:48:04 GMT (envelope-from theraven@FreeBSD.org) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.1 \(1827\)) Subject: Re: svn commit: r261801 - head/contrib/libc++/include From: David Chisnall In-Reply-To: <52FBC08C.30309@FreeBSD.org> Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2014 18:47:57 +0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <201402121814.s1CIEo5A016765@svn.freebsd.org> <52FBC08C.30309@FreeBSD.org> To: Jung-uk Kim X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1827) Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org, Dimitry Andric X-BeenThere: svn-src-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: "SVN commit messages for the entire src tree \(except for " user" and " projects" \)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2014 18:48:15 -0000 On 12 Feb 2014, at 18:42, Jung-uk Kim wrote: > It seems Apple removed it later. >=20 > = http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/cfe-commits/Week-of-Mon-20131125/094181= .html >=20 > Do you know what they did? They decided to break ABI compatibility with the version of XCode that = ships with the bug. This is probably not an option for us, although we = might consider it for FreeBSD 11 with a library version bump (it would = still be a lot of pain, as you wouldn't be able to mix C++ libraries), = but probably not unless we see bug reports related to our slight = standards non-compliance (std::pair having an explicit constructor) = causing real problems. David