Date: 31 Mar 2000 00:40:20 -0800 From: asami@FreeBSD.ORG (Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami) To: Will Andrews <andrews@technologist.com> Cc: Ade Lovett <ade@FreeBSD.ORG>, ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: final call: VERSION variable Message-ID: <vqck8ij1qiz.fsf@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu> In-Reply-To: Will Andrews's message of "Fri, 31 Mar 2000 00:25:22 -0500" References: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0003292033520.32828-100000@freefall.freebsd.org> <vqcu2ho4p6h.fsf@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu> <86aejgwf92.wl@archon.local.idaemons.org> <vqc4s9o3vhr.fsf@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu> <20000330192823.A7713@argon.blackdawn.com> <vqc8zz02btr.fsf@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu> <20000330213346.I14845@lovett.com> <20000331002522.D7713@argon.blackdawn.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* From: Will Andrews <andrews@technologist.com> * > My only question is whether we should take this opportunity * > (since we're going to be touching every single port Makefile) * > to do some other cruft cleanup... like removing all of the * > comments at the top.. maybe that's too draconian, but I really * > don't see the point in having them there.. it's not like they're * > all over the rest of the tree. No, other than the version info, I'd like to keep the rest of the header. They don't change much anyway. * How 'bout a.out support? We could rip that out too. :) That is already happening, in case you haven't been reading your commit mails. :> * Yes. Satoshi should do an "announcement"-style message in case anyone * decided to ignore this thread. :-) Ok. :) Satoshi To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?vqck8ij1qiz.fsf>