From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 8 22:52:04 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8634616A4FF for ; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 22:52:04 +0000 (GMT) Received: from linda-1.paradise.net.nz (bm-1a.paradise.net.nz [202.0.58.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF50043D2F for ; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 22:52:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from markir@paradise.net.nz) Received: from smtp-3.paradise.net.nz (smtp-3b.paradise.net.nz [202.0.32.212]) by linda-1.paradise.net.nz (Paradise.net.nz) with ESMTP id <0IA000CRUSUQ98@linda-1.paradise.net.nz> for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Sun, 09 Jan 2005 11:52:02 +1300 (NZDT) Received: from [192.168.1.11] (218-101-13-7.paradise.net.nz [218.101.13.7]) by smtp-3.paradise.net.nz (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBB13AE3CE; Sun, 09 Jan 2005 11:52:01 +1300 (NZDT) Date: Sun, 09 Jan 2005 11:55:54 +1300 From: Mark Kirkwood In-reply-to: <61671.192.168.0.1.1105185995.squirrel@192.168.0.1> To: Dominic Marks Message-id: <41E064FA.9020901@paradise.net.nz> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-Accept-Language: en-us, en User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20041016 References: <2193122205010713347f6225e4@mail.gmail.com> <41DF46ED.8050300@paradise.net.nz> <61671.192.168.0.1.1105185995.squirrel@192.168.0.1> cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org cc: fredrik engberg Subject: Re: Promise FastTrak Tx4200 & FreeBSD 5.3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2005 22:52:05 -0000 Dominic Marks wrote: >From a quick look in sys/ata and Google the PDC20619 seems to be the >TX4000 rather than the TX4200. Promise's website is, ... less than helpful >in finding these sorts of things out. > > > > You are right (on both counts ...). The lack of detection now makes it bit more sense, implying the chip is *not* one of those in the ata(4) list. I have fired off an email to Promise support asking what the chip PDC20XXX string is for the TX4200. Will post any useful reply obtained. Best wishes Mark