Date: Thu, 30 Jan 1997 10:20:14 +0100 From: j@uriah.heep.sax.de (J Wunsch) To: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org Subject: Re: XXXminpys question Message-ID: <Mutt.19970130102014.j@uriah.heep.sax.de> In-Reply-To: <32EFE3F5.237C228A@whistle.com>; from Julian Elischer on Jan 29, 1997 15:57:41 -0800 References: <XFMail.970129132302.Shimon@i-Connect.Net> <Mutt.19970129222900.j@uriah.heep.sax.de> <32EFE3F5.237C228A@whistle.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
As Julian Elischer wrote: > > The SCSI minphys routines seem to be called _in addition_ to the > > physio(9) minphys handling, to make the mess complete (once per call > > to scsi_strategy(), in sys/scsi/scsi_driver.c). > > exactly.. > the adapter or device might have more restrictions than > hte rest of the kernel, so they need a say. The adapters _are_ the reason for a minphys, so there should only be one at all. We should probably add it to the cdevsw entries. It can default to minphys (64 KB). -- cheers, J"org joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de -- http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ -- NIC: JW11-RIPE Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Mutt.19970130102014.j>