From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 7 05:16:48 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6FEFF27B; Sat, 7 Dec 2013 05:16:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ipmail06.adl2.internode.on.net (ipmail06.adl2.internode.on.net [IPv6:2001:44b8:8060:ff02:300:1:2:6]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88DC91315; Sat, 7 Dec 2013 05:16:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ppp121-45-108-103.lns20.adl6.internode.on.net (HELO leader.local) ([121.45.108.103]) by ipmail06.adl2.internode.on.net with ESMTP; 07 Dec 2013 15:46:44 +1030 Message-ID: <52A2AF39.7090006@ShaneWare.Biz> Date: Sat, 07 Dec 2013 15:46:41 +1030 From: Shane Ambler User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Gleb Smirnoff , Chris H Subject: Re: BETA4: fortune -o gone? References: <20131205090208.4cdba36b@X220.ovitrap.com> <20131205010722.GE44739@glenbarber.us> <020c58348f43c35da047761d0be6a9f4.authenticated@ultimatedns.net> <20131205105357.GU48919@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20131205105357.GU48919@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Glen Barber , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Erich Dollansky X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 07 Dec 2013 05:16:48 -0000 On 05/12/2013 21:23, Gleb Smirnoff wrote: > On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 10:58:41PM -0800, Chris H wrote: > C> > On Thu, Dec 05, 2013 at 09:02:08AM +0800, Erich Dollansky wrote: > C> >> I think that since I installed BETA1 the 'offensive' fortunes are gone? > C> >> I did a fresh install with a BETA1 CD and upgraded recently to BETA4. > C> > > C> > Yes, they were (finally) removed with extreme prejudice. > C> > C> Nobody likes a good BikeShed. But _really_? > C> Is FreeBSD going "PC" (Politically Correct)? > C> Looks like a sign of weakness. :( > > FreeBSD isn't going politically correct. The fortunes-o was removed > to save invaluable time, that developers used to spend discussing > changes to the file. > so fortunes-o contained inappropriate material that was worth arguing about but murphy-o isn't - guess it's too short to argue over? Now limerick and gerrold.limerick contains material that some would find offensive, yet they are just fine where they are....