From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 23 01:20:18 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F9BC16A4CE for ; Thu, 23 Dec 2004 01:20:18 +0000 (GMT) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FBBA43D46 for ; Thu, 23 Dec 2004 01:20:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id iBN1KIFT061209 for ; Thu, 23 Dec 2004 01:20:18 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id iBN1KITs061208; Thu, 23 Dec 2004 01:20:18 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2004 01:20:18 GMT Message-Id: <200412230120.iBN1KITs061208@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.org From: "R. Tyler Ballance" Subject: Re: sparc64/73782: libc is missing the _Qp_cmp function X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: "R. Tyler Ballance" List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2004 01:20:18 -0000 The following reply was made to PR sparc64/73782; it has been noted by GNATS. From: "R. Tyler Ballance" To: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org, dnelson@allantgroup.com Cc: Subject: Re: sparc64/73782: libc is missing the _Qp_cmp function Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2004 19:18:35 -0600 --=-PEI8uUE9i/QvWt5EMDdl Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Isn't the functionality of the _Qp_cmp function from NetBSD done by our _Qp_f function (found on line 90 of fpu_qp.c) Along those lines, how come that file defines the macro _QP_CMP and then the function 'int _Qp_f(u_int *a, u_int *b)' from what I can tell by glancing over the code, it's got the functionalty of the _Qp_cmp function, why is it not named as such (especially if it's defined in the sparc standard, i'm looking for it in there now) -R. Tyler Ballance --=-PEI8uUE9i/QvWt5EMDdl Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iQIVAwUAQcoc6Ogkwzi+drJUAQLiHA/+Lb1Tn5HX7Q5W2+4drPocFA4GQXo4FNu4 3xqS4J2LZmAn18bfmP68hH8/cFba+S1QXhlvPywFiM+aJz8uKm9CdWUz20OllxhW SqoLNKCO+e358uuaV24XfwRN5//b0Sa0/u85HQnQUZ4NTwFeRpgzaFjWWZpt97TU RWNh/0TgESMEsOX9mr/NeVWtyusQ3fcOcNeQwTa+azhKyeG+OrnSz0dU7pAo9Mse amULRyoBN2ct4vLbBCpAu8Lqr5haRP6MOASczznoAlZ1kp7InFNuO+Nj5bcNOIi1 rQtUgbyIh/+F62sZUv/45yP1hL+FItyPQXSwp0/NI6bn1qlBu3pYEnvvudFzkBy5 b998/XqUiuJWhz7gxe4fiu0X+7+x4UCPKAWpDQ4B5xP6W7BAHMulOhN7ze84PaCu 84nA9cF2QKi9BBYSTFYBd5aPJW/8Fu5zCJJo4qvGvNBxifmA5PGVNf+oblDMSBSd OfzqoX/FYI2ucy6/sOHq/jMTN9qfdrv98WsjfJHSYrkTUscfTzXf3BWMEudm7zzn oKRCO3UE5e1pMEKtb2t84eS3ylzAh9HlcLR5fxRvDmQKxP1XsZLsG82n93xmN52Q k9Ov/B3mPFOCUVdPb6982pHEA5vdJ/lSzN3k2fMMwgEBCaHAXrGxPOGvGxQ0zlLC TegvO6OhgHc= =FXOt -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-PEI8uUE9i/QvWt5EMDdl--