From owner-freebsd-hackers  Thu Dec 11 12:15:07 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id MAA11089
          for hackers-outgoing; Thu, 11 Dec 1997 12:15:07 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers)
Received: from anlsun.ebr.anlw.anl.gov (anlsun.ebr.anlw.anl.gov [141.221.1.2])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id MAA11067
          for <hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>; Thu, 11 Dec 1997 12:14:59 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from cmott@srv.net)
Received: from darkstar.home (ras575.srv.net [205.180.127.75]) by anlsun.ebr.anlw.anl.gov (8.6.11/8.6.11) with SMTP id NAA17394; Thu, 11 Dec 1997 13:14:54 -0700
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 1997 13:14:20 -0700 (MST)
From: Charles Mott <cmott@srv.net>
X-Sender: cmott@darkstar.home
To: Marc Slemko <marcs@znep.com>
cc: hackers <hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject: Re: FW: Why so many steps to build new kernel?
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.95.971211123824.7057F-100000@alive.znep.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.96.971211130956.27522A-100000@darkstar.home>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> > In a more perfect world, we would be using source code available browsers
> > that had evolved to use a free, ssh derivative encryption.  Instead we let
> 
> Huh?  "ssh derivative encryption" makes no sense.
> 

I guess I was thinking that ssh could be used to make a proxy connection
to the web servers (the -L option) which would also be running sshd. 
Communications would be over the secure port 22, and packets would be
locally shipped to port 80 on the web server.  Does this make any sense? 

Charles Mott