From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jul 30 19:41:42 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1423916A41F for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 19:41:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bfarrokhi@gmail.com) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.197]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BE5E43D49 for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 19:41:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bfarrokhi@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i4so802436wra for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 12:41:40 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=HOdwnANQA3W/cId7++KmiwGuFp03qbeDvvgPSXl1Vy56bHdPLNmfqMcJ+5UQ5TARzHHqsacw39N+/aLcf459F+Mn5mNQU+9L8rBr3xvGbM0EmOEOuF6F6aQorYDqp68tMt7aRKw7m3FmaQa6nbjFK0ZdFJlroWIPCB10emHdif0= Received: by 10.54.42.38 with SMTP id p38mr1995599wrp; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 12:41:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.3.37 with HTTP; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 12:41:40 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <9f7e126b050730124130c9bf87@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2005 00:11:40 +0430 From: Babak Farrokhi To: Mark Linimon In-Reply-To: <20050729203324.GA19476@soaustin.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <66A226C3557B48ED535E3FED@utd59514.utdallas.edu> <20050728154248.GA943@zi025.glhnet.mhn.de> <20050728164111.GA66015@isis.sigpipe.cz> <20050728170401.GA9534@soaustin.net> <20050728172249.GD66015@isis.sigpipe.cz> <20050728175142.GA11503@soaustin.net> <20050728225650.GE66015@isis.sigpipe.cz> <20050729020225.GA28471@soaustin.net> <20050729102158.GA73490@isis.sigpipe.cz> <20050729203324.GA19476@soaustin.net> Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: New port with maintainer ports@FreeBSD.org [was: Question about maintainers] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Babak Farrokhi List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 19:41:42 -0000 On 7/30/05, Mark Linimon wrote: > > If the maintainer is inactive, there isn't one. But we want to encourage > more people to be active maintainers. >=20 Good point. How do you encourage people to be active maintainers/contributo= rs? Let me give you an example: I am the maintainer for www/eventum. The current version in ports tree was 1.5.4 so I submitted the patch for 1.5.5 (ports/84297) and now version 1.6.0 is out but the patch is not submitted despite I was the maintainer myself. Another example: I submitted patch to update editors/vim to patchlevel 79, now this version is vulnerable to arbitrary command execution according to CAN-2005-2368. So I submitted the patchlevel 85 (ports/84145) and also notified security-team@. But the port is still awaiting approval. There is really something wrong with the port management process. People's work is not being respected. So how do I get encouraged to submit my patches? --=20 Babak Farrokhi email: babak@farrokhi.net web: http://farrokhi.net/