From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon Nov 19 21:22:40 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from peter3.wemm.org (c1315225-a.plstn1.sfba.home.com [24.14.150.180]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AFC737B416 for ; Mon, 19 Nov 2001 21:22:36 -0800 (PST) Received: from overcee.netplex.com.au (overcee.wemm.org [10.0.0.3]) by peter3.wemm.org (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id fAK5MaM45308 for ; Mon, 19 Nov 2001 21:22:36 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from peter@wemm.org) Received: from wemm.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by overcee.netplex.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C73C3811; Mon, 19 Nov 2001 21:22:36 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from peter@wemm.org) X-Mailer: exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001 with nmh-1.0.4 To: Leo Bicknell Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Ok, who broke timed? In-Reply-To: <20011119200200.A33416@ussenterprise.ufp.org> Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2001 21:22:36 -0800 From: Peter Wemm Message-Id: <20011120052236.0C73C3811@overcee.netplex.com.au> Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Leo Bicknell wrote: > On Mon, Nov 19, 2001 at 04:51:29PM -0800, John Baldwin wrote: > > That looks very promising indeed. Hrmm. I should go see if NetBSD has fix ed > > this. I guess having timeval be different sizes on different archs is a bi t of > > a pain. :( Perhaps it should use uint32_t? Or perhaps struct tsp should u se > > its own variant of timeval with uint32_t or some such. Ugh. > > If timeval is different sizes on different archs then I would > recomend the work be done take it to 64 bits, not 32. It fixes a > problem in about 30 years. :-) Unfortunately, it isn't our on-the-wire protocol to modify. Cheers, -Peter -- Peter Wemm - peter@FreeBSD.org; peter@yahoo-inc.com; peter@netplex.com.au "All of this is for nothing if we don't go to the stars" - JMS/B5 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message