From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 11 21:46:39 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB13D1065694 for ; Mon, 11 Jan 2010 21:46:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from delphij@gmail.com) Received: from mail-px0-f182.google.com (mail-px0-f182.google.com [209.85.216.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 715738FC0C for ; Mon, 11 Jan 2010 21:46:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pxi12 with SMTP id 12so14819357pxi.3 for ; Mon, 11 Jan 2010 13:46:39 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=2MSTIzeXeDQy2TjqqAAz6nLZUVNjozMY3+o/JJpj5NU=; b=n8EAiMHzBRztBhhRBypdl8D9saDSneSQz46pQgsHtdKzfZVPsHmSVqj44tMGha52bx YWWXpgmvzVtzxdg8klcr/JozSFe8h/dG3ohYZsAJndg9ThcSXFtuYvTxpoV9avYdXltd TMw8bTfpTczeaNSQfmikNuQy9s9kW9wFbrxto= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=LKlUFmgI19G/m+9jTabc1QUPgA9dywoeNelTViHNQjT2fhudOiOQh3dz4kkqG4aZEF scfeXkqyGitQuYXMHsL1JIzk2xAywJyi8CzQr6k/lksH62Qg/jSm8bsWbTeoxjoflLv9 OQT2as0yO977KDIGR1XgMJ08YndfppXsKd7sY= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.115.114.18 with SMTP id r18mr5961339wam.24.1263246399011; Mon, 11 Jan 2010 13:46:39 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20100111211005.GC1264@darklight.org.ru> References: <20100111211005.GC1264@darklight.org.ru> Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2010 13:46:38 -0800 Message-ID: From: Xin LI To: Yuri Pankov Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ZFS filesystem version confusion X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2010 21:46:39 -0000 On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 1:10 PM, Yuri Pankov wrote: > Hi, > > I was somewhat confused by the output of `zfs get version ` being 3, > when dmesg reads 'ZFS filesystem version 14'. Shouldn't we use > ZPL_VERSION_STRING in sys/cddl/contrib/opensolaris/uts/common/fs/zfs/zfs_vfsops.c > instead of SPA_VERSION_STRING to report ZFS filesystem version? I think it should be "ZFS Pool Version 14"... Cheers, -- Xin LI http://www.delphij.net