From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 19 23:56:23 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7A0616A41F; Mon, 19 Sep 2005 23:56:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Received: from pooker.samsco.org (pooker.samsco.org [168.103.85.57]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18B9E43D48; Mon, 19 Sep 2005 23:56:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Received: from [192.168.254.11] (junior.samsco.home [192.168.254.11]) (authenticated bits=0) by pooker.samsco.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j8JNuKNb029290; Mon, 19 Sep 2005 17:56:20 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Message-ID: <432F502E.10000@samsco.org> Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2005 17:56:30 -0600 From: Scott Long User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.8) Gecko/20050615 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "M. Warner Losh" References: <20050919.083111.123550990.imp@bsdimp.com> <20050919145417.GE83017@ip.net.ua> <432ED22E.5010005@samsco.org> <20050919.174902.66273219.imp@bsdimp.com> In-Reply-To: <20050919.174902.66273219.imp@bsdimp.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=3.8 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=failed version=3.0.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.2 (2004-11-16) on pooker.samsco.org Cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, ru@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/dev/ed if_ed.c if_ed_pccard.c if_edvar.h X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2005 23:56:23 -0000 M. Warner Losh wrote: > In message: <432ED22E.5010005@samsco.org> > Scott Long writes: > : Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > : > On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 08:31:11AM -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote: > : > > : >>In message: <20050919054051.GB65954@ip.net.ua> > : >> Ruslan Ermilov writes: > : >>: About the commonality... Usually foo_stop() (which is called first in > : >>: foo_detach() if you were talking about the detach) disables interrupts, > : >>: so foo_intr() doesn't usually happen. From reading the code, I see the > : >>: same holds true for ed(4). > : >> > : >>Wrong. Foo_intr() does still happen because other devices can > : >>generate interrupts... > : >> > : > > : > Ah, you're right, I missed this bit. :-) > : > > : > : Shared interrupts are only slightly less of an abomination as shared > : ithreads =-) > > Sadly, shared interrupts are a fact of life in the x86 world. And > on platforms that support pci to pccard/cardbus bridges, there will > always be sharing of interrupts due to the architecture of the YENTA > bridges... > > Warner Luckily Express Card (or whatever they decided to call it this week) will make this obsolete over time. Scott