Date: Mon, 11 Mar 1996 11:19:25 PST From: "Marty Leisner" <leisner@sdsp.mc.xerox.com> To: Darren Reed <avalon@coombs.anu.edu.au> Cc: archie@tribe.com (Archie Cobbs), hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: When is 2.2 Estimated to be released? Message-ID: <9603111919.AA07438@johngalt.mc.xerox.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 08 Mar 1996 21:02:49 PST." <199603090501.VAA18912@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> I don't think LILO is anywhere near as good as booteasy. > For one, there's only a Unix/Linux interface, AFAIK. > Another, is LILO doesn't give a menu (by default). > > I can boot everything but Linux with booteasy, across two HD's. > Why do we need LILO ? :-) > > darren I think work has to be done in all camps to make it work more consistently...I have several machines I use with a combination of windows/freebsd/linux fbsdboot and booteasy give different results depending on (it appears) system differences. I don't use lilo yet (I need to learn how to use it...) but loadlin seems to work everywhere (even ontrack disks...). -- marty leisner@sdsp.mc.xerox.com Member of the League for Programming Freedom
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?9603111919.AA07438>