From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org  Sat Nov 18 18:26:09 2017
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AB1CDC1186
 for <freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>;
 Sat, 18 Nov 2017 18:26:09 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from m.muenz@spam-fetish.org)
Received: from mailout-02.maxonline.de (mailout-02.maxonline.de [81.24.66.23])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256
 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DDE8178324
 for <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>; Sat, 18 Nov 2017 18:26:08 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from m.muenz@spam-fetish.org)
Received: from web03-01.max-it.de (web03-01.max-it.de [81.24.64.215])
 by mailout-02.maxonline.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 813D767
 for <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>; Sat, 18 Nov 2017 19:17:38 +0100 (CET)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by web03-01.max-it.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 763EC28B83B
 for <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>; Sat, 18 Nov 2017 19:17:38 +0100 (CET)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at web03-01.max-it.de
Received: from web03-01.max-it.de ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (web03-01.max-it.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026)
 with ESMTP id JFKT5h9mDLlX for <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>;
 Sat, 18 Nov 2017 19:17:38 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [81.24.66.132] (unknown [81.24.66.132])
 (Authenticated sender: m.muenz@spam-fetish.org)
 by web03-01.max-it.de (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 40C1328B839
 for <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>; Sat, 18 Nov 2017 19:17:38 +0100 (CET)
Subject: Re: OpenVPN vs IPSec
To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
References: <20171118165842.GA73810@admin.sibptus.transneft.ru>
From: "Muenz, Michael" <m.muenz@spam-fetish.org>
Message-ID: <b96b449e-3dc1-6e75-e803-e6d6abefe88e@spam-fetish.org>
Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2017 19:17:37 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/52.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20171118165842.GA73810@admin.sibptus.transneft.ru>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.25
Precedence: list
List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD <freebsd-net.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-net>,
 <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-net@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
 <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2017 18:26:09 -0000

Am 18.11.2017 um 17:58 schrieb Victor Sudakov:
> Dear Colleagues,
>
> Is there any reason to prefer IPSec over OpenVPN for building VPNs
> between FreeBSD hosts and routers (and others compatible with OpenVPN
> like pfSense, OpenWRT etc)?
>
> I can see only advantages of OpenVPN (a single UDP port, a single
> userland daemon, no kernel rebuild required, a standard PKI, an easy
> way to push settings and routes to remote clients, nice monitoring
> feature etc). But maybe there is some huge advantage of IPSec I've
> skipped?
>
Hi,

partners/customers with Cisco IOS or ASA wont be able to partner up 
without IPSEC.

Michael