From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 22 16:41:14 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A230E80 for ; Thu, 22 Nov 2012 16:41:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 563FA8FC12 for ; Thu, 22 Nov 2012 16:41:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-51-39.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.51.39]) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFDBA3CFFB; Thu, 22 Nov 2012 17:41:12 +0100 (CET) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id qAMGfD8D002068; Thu, 22 Nov 2012 17:41:13 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2012 17:41:13 +0100 From: Polytropon To: Karl Pielorz Subject: Re: freebsd-update - To 'Stable'? Message-Id: <20121122174113.fd724619.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: References: Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2012 16:41:14 -0000 On Thu, 22 Nov 2012 16:32:21 +0000, Karl Pielorz wrote: > I'm looking at switching to 'freebsd-update' - is there an equivalent way > to get it to update me to '-STABLE'? No. The freebsd-update program can only be used to follow the RELEASE branch, plus the security updates (RELEASE-pN). Following STABLE branch still requires you to update by source. > i.e. If I run this on a 9.0-RELEASE box, I end up with 9.0-RELEASE-p4 (even > though uname says '-p3' - it's apparently -p4. The -pN number will only be changed if the kernel has gotten a change in this security patch run. > I'm guessing that's not the same as if I'd csup'd to 9.0-STABLE on that > day, and rebuilt the world? Correct. STABLE is a development branch (even though as the name suggests, it's stable, not experimental, which would apply to HEAD or CURRENT). > Also, does freebsd-update warn you if you need to reboot/rebuild anything > (e.g. the kernel / userland or anything?) You usually _have_ to reboot the system, as you've just upgraded to a new operating system version. So at least that would be the safest way. :-) Rebuilding is only needed if you run a custom kernel. The userland will be upgraded in a binary way (just as the GENERIC kernel in case you're using it). -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ...