Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 22 Oct 2004 12:33:48 -0400
From:      Mike Edenfield <kutulu@kutulu.org>
To:        Benjamin Lutz <benlutz@datacomm.ch>
Cc:        freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: ports/www is too full
Message-ID:  <4179366C.9010404@kutulu.org>
In-Reply-To: <200410221824.12294.benlutz@datacomm.ch>
References:  <20041022074529.GN10363@k7.mavetju> <41791AF7.2050009@vonostingroup.com> <200410221824.12294.benlutz@datacomm.ch>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Benjamin Lutz wrote:

> Reading between the lines, the problem you're having is that the ports 
> aren't well enough categorized at the moment. How about borrowing an idea 
> from some of the knowledge databases, and using keywords to mark ports? 
> Eg, instead of creating a www-server category, the apache port could be 
> marked "server www". linux-opera could be market "binary browser client 
> linux www" or something like that.

FreeBSD already has "virtual" categories -- categories that aren't used 
to physically sort the ports.  For example, devel/tcl84/Makefile has:
CATEGORIES=     lang tcl84

tcl84 isn't a real folders, but it's listed in a number of port's
$ make search key=tcl84 | grep "Port:" | wc -l
        40

One thing I don't see is a way to search or sort by category, but I 
admit to not having looking very hard.

--Mike




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4179366C.9010404>