Date: Fri, 09 Feb 2001 22:48:12 +0100 From: Andre Oppermann <oppermann@monzoon.net> To: Matt Dillon <dillon@earth.backplane.com> Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@conectiva.com.br>, Mike Silbersack <silby@silby.com>, Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk>, Charles Randall <crandall@matchlogic.com>, Dan Phoenix <dphoenix@bravenet.com>, Alfred Perlstein <bright@wintelcom.net>, Jos Backus <josb@cncdsl.com>, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: soft updates and qmail (RE: qmail IO problems) Message-ID: <3A84659C.F841F58E@monzoon.net> References: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0102061555550.1535-100000@duckman.distro.conectiva> <3A805035.C71AAD5E@monzoon.net> <200102061943.f16Jhp365113@earth.backplane.com> <3A805938.96ED890D@monzoon.net> <200102062018.f16KIdx66146@earth.backplane.com> <200102090602.f1962cM19819@earth.backplane.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Matt Dillon wrote: > > Well, after a long conversation with Mr Bernstein and Kirk it turns out > that all my blathering about a normal FFS mount being easily corruptable > due to a crash occuring during heavy disk I/O (e.g. from qmail) is so > much smoke. > > The fsync()/rename() combination that QMail does should be sufficient to > guarentee (baring a bug in kernel) that a crash will not result in any > lost mail queue files when using a normal FFS mount (without softupdates). > > However, I still recommend using softupdates. I do. Is it safe there as well (from your point of view)? -- Andre > -Matt > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3A84659C.F841F58E>