From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 20 16:06:56 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 313A8106566B for ; Wed, 20 Jun 2012 16:06:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) Received: from oproxy5-pub.bluehost.com (oproxy5.bluehost.com [IPv6:2605:dc00:100:2::a5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CE7B68FC08 for ; Wed, 20 Jun 2012 16:06:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 13310 invoked by uid 0); 20 Jun 2012 16:06:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO box543.bluehost.com) (74.220.219.143) by cpoproxy2.bluehost.com with SMTP; 20 Jun 2012 16:06:55 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=apotheon.com; s=default; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:To:From:Date; bh=c/jfWiFAmJrtIcSxJ89LV6+mECVvPK0cXE6N4DY8xGU=; b=lf2yU4gFJvZgcQ3WLMuFhIvizf6VPCin5Dq36KECEkC9NBYivxlSvetTAGQv09UKycUzorsBx1BDIWzpkgah64GiAbyMVnPCgh3tyf+1E1x0aj9hfGgn7HvQqfZ2aiXG; Received: from [24.8.180.234] (port=61377 helo=localhost) by box543.bluehost.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1ShNQl-0000ac-4B for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 20 Jun 2012 10:06:55 -0600 Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 10:06:55 -0600 From: Chad Perrin To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20120620160655.GA21283@hemlock.hydra> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20120619205225.21d6709f.freebsd@edvax.de> <20f61898ce668c96f8882981cf8e24f6@remailer.privacy.at> <20120620030854.GA15821@hemlock.hydra> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Identified-User: {2737:box543.bluehost.com:apotheon:apotheon.com} {sentby:smtp auth 24.8.180.234 authed with perrin@apotheon.com} Subject: Re: Why Clang X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 16:06:56 -0000 On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 06:45:16AM +0200, Wojciech Puchar wrote: > >>>but not to be turned into closed source products. > >> > >>What a lying sonofabitch. That is not called freedom. That is called > >>"forcible, viral open source". I think we can all see the difference. Open > >>your motherfucking eyes, communist goofball... > > > >Give him a break. His heart is in the right place, though his choice of > > GNU licence is nothing about freedom, it just says it is freedom. > > But what really is important for FreeBSD is if it can be used. IMHO > nothing from GPLv3 prevents it, and it is no licence based reasons > to use clang. 1. This has nothing to do with what I said. 2. I prefer Clang. -- Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ]