From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 13 15:59:59 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CF7216A46F for ; Tue, 13 Jun 2006 15:59:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nathanw@uchicago.edu) Received: from mx05.uchicago.edu (mx05.uchicago.edu [128.135.12.175]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C72443D45 for ; Tue, 13 Jun 2006 15:59:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nathanw@uchicago.edu) Received: from harper.uchicago.edu (harper.uchicago.edu [128.135.12.7]) by mx05.uchicago.edu (8.13.6/8.12.9) with ESMTP id k5DFxrQ0000586; Tue, 13 Jun 2006 10:59:53 -0500 (CDT) Received: from localhost (nathanw@localhost) by harper.uchicago.edu (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id k5DFxrja018673; Tue, 13 Jun 2006 10:59:53 -0500 (CDT) X-Authentication-Warning: harper.uchicago.edu: nathanw owned process doing -bs Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2006 10:59:53 -0500 (CDT) From: Nathan Whitehorn To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20060613154854.GA9037@dragon.NUXI.org> Message-ID: References: <1A384146-1D91-498F-A96D-538A1056AACB@ocsny.com> <20060613154854.GA9037@dragon.NUXI.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Uchicago-PMX-Id: 128.135.12.7: k5DFxrQ0000586 [Tue Jun 13 10:59:54 2006] X-Uchicago-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7% Cc: Subject: Re: Sun Fire servers.... X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2006 15:59:59 -0000 No, 2 GB. It should be fine, but the drives get out of sync with one another and that confuses things badly. -Nathan On Tue, 13 Jun 2006, David O'Brien wrote: > On Mon, Jun 12, 2006 at 11:05:20PM -0500, Nathan Whitehorn wrote: >> I'm running 6.1-STABLE on one. Works beautifully. Avoid the SATA RAID. >> It's terrible, and causes fs corruption. And you'll need to update to > > Is this with more tha 4GB of RAM? There was a SATA bug that should be > fixed in 6.1-STABLE (but maybe not). > > -- > -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org) > Q: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. > A: Why is top-posting (putting a reply at the top of the message) frowned upon? >