From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 27 07:09:02 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 092AA16A474 for ; Wed, 27 Jun 2007 07:09:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from f.bonnet@esiee.fr) Received: from mail.esiee.fr (mail.esiee.fr [147.215.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C30E813C484 for ; Wed, 27 Jun 2007 07:09:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from f.bonnet@esiee.fr) Received: from mail.esiee.fr (localhost.esiee.fr [127.0.0.1]) by mail.esiee.fr (Postfix) with SMTP id EB1A13658BA; Wed, 27 Jun 2007 09:09:00 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [147.215.1.21] (lisa.esiee.fr [147.215.1.21]) by mail.esiee.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D5733658A0; Wed, 27 Jun 2007 09:09:00 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <46820CEF.8050404@esiee.fr> Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2007 09:08:31 +0200 From: Frank Bonnet User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (X11/20061027) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dan Nelson References: <46812FE9.2050104@esiee.fr> <20070626153618.GG6494@dan.emsphone.com> In-Reply-To: <20070626153618.GG6494@dan.emsphone.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions Subject: Re: Bondbind like for FreeBSD ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2007 07:09:02 -0000 Dan Nelson wrote: > In the last episode (Jun 26), Frank Bonnet said: >> Hello >> >> Is there a FreeBSD tool that is equivalent of "bondbind" for Linux ( >> ethernet load balancing or trunking that use the Cisco's >> etherchannel ) ? > > You can use the lagg device in 6-stable and -current; mmh interresting , does this works for the amd64 version too ? I use an IBM x3650 which is a native 64 bits bi-proc machine. if you're running > 6.2 or older you can use ng_fec or ng_one2many, but they both use > static configuration and aren't as nice. Yes I read about this but it is far to be as useful as the Linux "bonding" module Anyway thanks for you answer Dan :-) -- Cordialement Frank Bonnet InBSDWeTrust