From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Oct  4 11:17:21 2013
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAA84254
 for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Fri,  4 Oct 2013 11:17:21 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from rfg@tristatelogic.com)
Received: from outgoing.tristatelogic.com (segfault.tristatelogic.com
 [69.62.255.118]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E4602669
 for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Fri,  4 Oct 2013 11:17:21 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from segfault-nmh-helo.tristatelogic.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by segfault.tristatelogic.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CE863AF13;
 Fri,  4 Oct 2013 04:17:12 -0700 (PDT)
From: "Ronald F. Guilmette" <rfg@tristatelogic.com>
To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, kamikaze@bsdforen.de
Subject: multimedia/libbluray -- IGNORE... Why?
Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2013 04:17:12 -0700
Message-ID: <48936.1380885432@server1.tristatelogic.com>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-ports>,
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2013 11:17:21 -0000



Why is the multimedia/libbluray port marked as IGNORE in the current ports
tree?

More to the point, why didn't whoever marked it as IGNORE have the simple
courtesy to put at least some explanitory note about the marking of this
port (as IGNORE) into the UPDATING file?