From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 16 17:20:20 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55E5716A4CE for ; Fri, 16 Jul 2004 17:20:20 +0000 (GMT) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5118543D1F for ; Fri, 16 Jul 2004 17:20:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i6GHKK4v046441 for ; Fri, 16 Jul 2004 17:20:20 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i6GHKKnk046440; Fri, 16 Jul 2004 17:20:20 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2004 17:20:20 GMT Message-Id: <200407161720.i6GHKKnk046440@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: Mark Linimon Subject: Re: kern/51583: [PATCH] allow to work with devices and sockets over nullfs [STABLE, 5.0-CURRENT] X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Mark Linimon List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2004 17:20:20 -0000 The following reply was made to PR kern/51583; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Mark Linimon To: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org, Cc: Subject: Re: kern/51583: [PATCH] allow to work with devices and sockets over nullfs [STABLE, 5.0-CURRENT] Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2004 12:17:32 -0500 (CDT) Adding to audit trail from email received: From: Jeremie Le Hen I tried the attached patch, and it's appear to be only a half-fix. To test it, I made a small server which listens on a named Unix socket and a client sending an hello message through it. Here are the results on a 5-CURRENT (about 50 days ago) (`lower' means the program opens the socket on the lower filesystem while `upper' means it is on the null layer) : Without patch With Dmitry Sivachenko's patch client(lower) / OK OK server(lower) client(upper) / Failed OK server(lower) client(lower) / Failed Failed server(upper) client(upper) / OK OK server(upper) I hope this can help. I tried to understand why it fails, but my programming skills are not good enough. Regards, -- Jeremie LE HEN aka TtZ/TataZ jeremie.le-hen@epita.fr ttz@epita.fr