From nobody Tue Oct 22 20:12:42 2024 X-Original-To: freebsd-net@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4XY3JV3Z7Gz5ZKHP for ; Tue, 22 Oct 2024 20:12:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from void@f-m.fm) Received: from fout-b4-smtp.messagingengine.com (fout-b4-smtp.messagingengine.com [202.12.124.147]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4XY3JS5gY8z43LC for ; Tue, 22 Oct 2024 20:12:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from void@f-m.fm) Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=f-m.fm header.s=fm3 header.b=PPW+akrA; dkim=pass header.d=messagingengine.com header.s=fm3 header.b="K/eV8u1R"; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of void@f-m.fm designates 202.12.124.147 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=void@f-m.fm; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=f-m.fm Received: from phl-compute-08.internal (phl-compute-08.phl.internal [10.202.2.48]) by mailfout.stl.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2593211400A9 for ; Tue, 22 Oct 2024 16:12:55 -0400 (EDT) Received: from phl-mailfrontend-01 ([10.202.2.162]) by phl-compute-08.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 22 Oct 2024 16:12:55 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=f-m.fm; h=cc :content-type:content-type:date:date:from:from:in-reply-to :in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject :subject:to:to; s=fm3; t=1729627974; x=1729714374; bh=lp5Ss2Sq+j cZ72svUSmsTlZBupthLMZxXDOcdScbgQc=; b=PPW+akrAOt6pSHQ9ISuO3CunXf jOaf08jtpt2EKG3MNR7rCtNVXwP1+l4DFVW8kD6+UDbGOdcyaKI3AOaTkT4L4b8A iIBKBgNdrgVHGkbuwWWmlwn/Z3197YU0g4uiGd0UqP5+WcxZbKFD288njKdSZtdL Evi4kHnXaGQghGvaVLKBtuUcpFcQ8Dna5H3J7pVgG3dvSwHlBIAdszJmkfuRi6ag xEUupDKDtNcU6eU+dowhAEfcr2uK7+kIAJaSESsCY33bNI4oRNo7+yeuzmqIGi1w b0x9fWJ2n7kXj4A1y6bEUb1rYr/1liybee5YFqJLaJAbMiz2J4ZjLhOr0X8Q== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:content-type:date:date :feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject:subject:to :to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s= fm3; t=1729627974; x=1729714374; bh=lp5Ss2Sq+jcZ72svUSmsTlZBupth LMZxXDOcdScbgQc=; b=K/eV8u1RneUKCxSob8Qjp+kl4tEV3Jer5J3Gk2Onzwhw Km3nlVPsvoy3v9GsDGpEAyFyrhr3cIdhEwd1lBc9Qi+qnFUl+wfTL7lNj18zMQkx a73AiUFLaYdIiySBKK/NxFZWd47bFGXpg3POvxLRsw5e/sW68JwtbnbG54P+W8st jFkYyQcveSO85atK2ms7J0RH0biHhevHG+XUULSkGEgKlCq/zPJRsbbOSaKguMQM u/4ByZ5punuW72loe3rrkeuGDvjuN0mIB5Akx2x3CDfZluKUbHlK79ZKO5/alW7D QBUdm6ZRXpL4U2/5O03cfVmeW8FrqNVkVl0nr0ScEg== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeeftddrvdeihedgudegiecutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpggftfghnshhusghstghrihgsvgdp uffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecujfgurhepfffhvf fukfhfgggtuggjsehttdertddttddvnecuhfhrohhmpehvohhiugcuoehvohhiugesfhdq mhdrfhhmqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeekleduvdelhfeileefgffghfffkedtheelle fgudfgvdegkeejjedutdehhefgueenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgr mhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehvohhiugesfhdqmhdrfhhmpdhnsggprhgtphhtthhopedupd hmohguvgepshhmthhpohhuthdprhgtphhtthhopehfrhgvvggsshguqdhnvghtsehfrhgv vggsshgurdhorhhg X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: i2541463c:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA for ; Tue, 22 Oct 2024 16:12:54 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2024 21:12:42 +0100 From: void To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Performance test for CUBIC in stable/14 Message-ID: References: List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.60 / 15.00]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-1.000]; MID_RHS_NOT_FQDN(0.50)[]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[f-m.fm,none]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[f-m.fm:s=fm3,messagingengine.com:s=fm3]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:202.12.124.128/27]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[202.12.124.147:from]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[f-m.fm]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[f-m.fm]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-net@freebsd.org]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[f-m.fm:+,messagingengine.com:+]; MLMMJ_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-net@freebsd.org]; MISSING_XM_UA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:151847, ipnet:202.12.124.0/24, country:AU]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[messagingengine.com:dkim] X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4XY3JS5gY8z43LC X-Spamd-Bar: --- On Tue, Oct 22, 2024 at 03:57:42PM -0400, Cheng Cui wrote: >What is the output from `ping` (latency) between these VMs? That test wasn't between VMs. It was from the vm with the patches to a workstation on the same switch. ping from the vm to the workstation: --- 192.168.1.232 ping statistics --- 10 packets transmitted, 10 packets received, 0.0% packet loss round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 0.643/0.796/0.870/0.070 ms ping from the vm with patches to an alpine linux vm on the same host: --- 192.168.1.65 ping statistics --- 10 packets transmitted, 10 packets received, 0.0% packet loss round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 0.734/0.859/0.963/0.073 ms --