From owner-freebsd-emulation Tue May 26 09:52:51 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id JAA02522 for freebsd-emulation-outgoing; Tue, 26 May 1998 09:52:51 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from jingoro.prevmed.sunysb.edu (jingoro.prevmed.sunysb.edu [129.49.123.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id JAA02517 for ; Tue, 26 May 1998 09:52:46 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from cfanning@jingoro.prevmed.sunysb.edu) Received: (from cfanning@localhost) by jingoro.prevmed.sunysb.edu (8.8.8/8.8.5) id MAA27033; Tue, 26 May 1998 12:43:28 GMT From: Chris Fanning Message-Id: <199805261243.MAA27033@jingoro.prevmed.sunysb.edu> Subject: Re: Linux uname(3) and licensed apps In-Reply-To: from Stephen Roome at "May 26, 98 11:13:09 am" To: steve@visint.co.uk (Stephen Roome) Date: Tue, 26 May 1998 12:43:28 +0000 (GMT) Cc: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL31H (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > On Mon, 25 May 1998, Chris Fanning wrote: > > Evangelism aside, I have an application that requires uname() to return > > Linux. I've spoken with them and they have no intention of providing a > > workaround until September earliest. > > > > > What do I have to do to get this running? > > This isn't elegant.. Thanks for everyone's help. No, it's not elegant, but it got the program running. At least to the point that I found out that it required pthreads... Ah well, I'll give another shot asking for "FreeBSD native" and then give in. :) Chris To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-emulation" in the body of the message