Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2005 14:41:57 +0100 From: Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@Leidinger.net> To: Michael Johnson <ahze@ahze.net> Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Intel compiler build problems Message-ID: <20050211144157.ml75i7mvwwcgk4c4@netchild.homeip.net> In-Reply-To: <E098470B-C5FF-4FB4-99F3-289FB1FA696C@ahze.net> References: <200502101408.j1AE8a8L077797@sleipnir.ncsa.uiuc.edu> <E098470B-C5FF-4FB4-99F3-289FB1FA696C@ahze.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Michael Johnson <ahze@ahze.net> wrote: > Maybe we can make stlport-icc not a slave port anymore and use the > older version of stlport for icc ?? The ideal way would be to split the stlport up into MI (headers) and MD (libs) parts. Else you can't install the icc and gcc version at the same time. Feel free to send patches / take over the port. Bye, Alexander. -- http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander @ Leidinger.net: PGP ID = B0063FE7 http://www.FreeBSD.org netchild @ FreeBSD.org : PGP ID = 72077137 In order to get a loan you must first prove you don't need it.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050211144157.ml75i7mvwwcgk4c4>