From owner-freebsd-current Mon May 26 13:26:15 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id NAA09340 for current-outgoing; Mon, 26 May 1997 13:26:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from phaeton.artisoft.com (phaeton.Artisoft.COM [198.17.250.50]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id NAA09329 for ; Mon, 26 May 1997 13:26:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from terry@localhost) by phaeton.artisoft.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) id NAA14105; Mon, 26 May 1997 13:22:44 -0700 From: Terry Lambert Message-Id: <199705262022.NAA14105@phaeton.artisoft.com> Subject: Re: cd9660 w/ Joliet extensions To: albast@magigimmix.xs4all.nl (Jeroen) Date: Mon, 26 May 1997 13:22:43 -0700 (MST) Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <199705252141.XAA26208@smtp1.xs4all.nl> from "Jeroen" at May 25, 97 11:40:02 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > > People who find it disconcerting (that "disk inserting" ;) causes > > an AutoRun) probably are not well enough educated about their OS > > to turn it off. > > *please* move this BS thread to -chat.. don't use -current to > chitchat about the windows registry! What about using -current to discus whether the CDROM distribution ought to have an autorun.inf that starts it up under Windows95? The discussion so far has been: A: "Does it have it?" B: "No" A: "Can you add it?" B: "People find autorun disconcerting." A: "Can't they disable it? It seems to me that it would help far more people than it would disconcert." B: "No. They can't disable it" C: "Yes, the can. Here's how..." "(implied) What valid excuses remain for not having one?" D: "Can't you move this thread? I (erroneously) believe it's not relevent..." Regards, Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers.