From owner-freebsd-hackers Sat Aug 30 21:22:16 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id VAA17831 for hackers-outgoing; Sat, 30 Aug 1997 21:22:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rah.star-gate.com (rah.star-gate.com [204.188.121.18]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id VAA17809; Sat, 30 Aug 1997 21:22:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rah.star-gate.com (localhost.star-gate.com [127.0.0.1]) by rah.star-gate.com (8.8.7/8.8.5) with ESMTP id TAA00923; Sat, 30 Aug 1997 19:58:40 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <199708310258.TAA00923@rah.star-gate.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0gamma 1/27/96 To: "David E. Cross" cc: Luigi Rizzo , hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, multimedia@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: IRQ problem (was Re: IRQ timing) In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 30 Aug 1997 20:57:04 EDT." Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Sat, 30 Aug 1997 19:58:40 -0700 From: Amancio Hasty Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk We need a little bit more of information: o OS version o is the card using auto dma? o dma channels being used for the sound card o name of the app o buffer size used in in the application o complete dmesg output -- i want to know cpu model, etc.. o sound card brand/model Tnks, Amancio >From The Desk Of "David E. Cross" : > On Sat, 30 Aug 1997, Luigi Rizzo wrote: > > > > I just sent a message to the OSS people, and they mentioned that some of > > > the problem I am experiencing is a result of some tight IRQ timing that > > > the FreeBSD kernel has (ie, it takes too long to transfer the data). I > > > > > > would you care to mention what problem are you experiencing ? > > > > Curiously I have a related question, so hope people would excluse the > > crosspost.. > > > > The exact problem is that at the highest sampling rate > (44.1KHz/16Bit/Stereo) I get skips in the music, even in an unloaded > system. I emailed 4front-tech about this and said that it was a known > problem due to FreeBSD's tightness in the IRQ code. I was hoping that > this was something that could be fairly easily changed (ie. a #define > somewhere). (They did mention that they had spoken to some of the kernel > team about this). > > Are there any beta patches, or pointers where to start digging. I have > already started poking arround in /usr/src/sys/i386/isa. > > -- > David Cross > ACS Consultant >