From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 12 09:11:37 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: doc@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95C49106564A for ; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 09:11:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from utisoft@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bk0-f54.google.com (mail-bk0-f54.google.com [209.85.214.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 170D78FC0A for ; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 09:11:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bkcjc3 with SMTP id jc3so1815341bkc.13 for ; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 02:11:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=MJYu3oSeLJBurAQejIWMgu/H5ZqJhd5WgHVLwJiSATA=; b=m3OA5eLh1NT1g9O+g8YmRHKZU3ZNNcGb0cUCGFMxUPMw6QBuSvHMWFDQ7fKN+piKnW xwXokj/z4Hqgb8gPQaf1d51jAxLXzbWBb8kiXcsHXP52gQfDaZ9PrmUrQSabtlO5XdNF OZAibH8SjruUdpNX4W1MoHaI8LNTiroQn+b45Pmkqf7/kRCmXQ2A/R673HGkfierI6T0 YGuYz5DJ90UrSudrRMmmktKGgzTqxdYB6GXwnig2XrFCIl1U2hK5Y+5ra+811j2w8n3F 380xgg4Eg0lR1qq3u7ICKWMEcNYmdAuAmvXAGQzfbKLC/6BWAb8c2P+K0JcSmLFtAwJk pvkg== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.205.117.15 with SMTP id fk15mr462107bkc.133.1334221895860; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 02:11:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.202.142 with HTTP; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 02:11:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.202.142 with HTTP; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 02:11:35 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20120412090309.GK26895@goofy01.vnodelab.local> References: <20120412090309.GK26895@goofy01.vnodelab.local> Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 09:11:35 +0000 Message-ID: From: Chris Rees To: Joel Dahl Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: doc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: "Doing the deed" on portupgrade X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 09:11:37 -0000 On 12 Apr 2012 10:03, "Joel Dahl" wrote: > > On 12-04-2012 8:26, Chris Rees wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Even since its deprecation, portupgrade has proven to be very popular > > with newcomers, which I might be inclined to blame on the fact that > > the Handbook lists it first. > > > > Two patches: > > > > http://www.bayofrum.net/~crees/patches/move-portupgrade.diff -- move > > the portupgrade section to the bottom > > > > http://www.bayofrum.net/~crees/patches/deprecate-portupgrade.diff -- > > add a note to suggest it's a bad idea to use it. > > > > Rendered at http://www.bayofrum.net/~crees/rendered/portupgrade.html > > > > Thoughts? Anyone want to risk approving it? > > Good idea. I'd like to see Portmaster first in the list though, and not > Portmanager. > I thought about that too. I'll get new patches sent shortly. Chris