Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 09:11:35 +0000 From: Chris Rees <utisoft@gmail.com> To: Joel Dahl <joel@vnode.se> Cc: doc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: "Doing the deed" on portupgrade Message-ID: <CADLo838Mm-McGKqjp1dq6GcmV_HW0i2EaBcyvpgrVnL0VB8paw@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20120412090309.GK26895@goofy01.vnodelab.local> References: <CADLo839V4BtuRF-ze6qS3xvU1kYsi_7KoChP7WFaYx5D59oZBA@mail.gmail.com> <20120412090309.GK26895@goofy01.vnodelab.local>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 12 Apr 2012 10:03, "Joel Dahl" <joel@vnode.se> wrote: > > On 12-04-2012 8:26, Chris Rees wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Even since its deprecation, portupgrade has proven to be very popular > > with newcomers, which I might be inclined to blame on the fact that > > the Handbook lists it first. > > > > Two patches: > > > > http://www.bayofrum.net/~crees/patches/move-portupgrade.diff -- move > > the portupgrade section to the bottom > > > > http://www.bayofrum.net/~crees/patches/deprecate-portupgrade.diff -- > > add a note to suggest it's a bad idea to use it. > > > > Rendered at http://www.bayofrum.net/~crees/rendered/portupgrade.html > > > > Thoughts? Anyone want to risk approving it? > > Good idea. I'd like to see Portmaster first in the list though, and not > Portmanager. > I thought about that too. I'll get new patches sent shortly. Chris
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CADLo838Mm-McGKqjp1dq6GcmV_HW0i2EaBcyvpgrVnL0VB8paw>