From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 18 14:07:35 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14C76106566C for ; Wed, 18 Nov 2009 14:07:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwatson@FreeBSD.org) Received: from cyrus.watson.org (cyrus.watson.org [65.122.17.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEC0C8FC14 for ; Wed, 18 Nov 2009 14:07:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.2.101] (host217-43-176-60.range217-43.btcentralplus.com [217.43.176.60]) by cyrus.watson.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E920A46B5B; Wed, 18 Nov 2009 09:07:33 -0500 (EST) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1077) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 From: "Robert N. M. Watson" In-Reply-To: <866398ue25.fsf@ds4.des.no> Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 14:07:32 +0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <56A320F3-A099-4DE6-84EE-7F9CCE3A5CB4@FreeBSD.org> References: <200911172043.28008.gnemmi@gmail.com> <20091118000838.60CBC1CC47@ptavv.es.net> <19e9a5dc0911171905r67f4e9c4q8513782cce8f5f82@mail.gmail.com> <367b2c980911180330x32407537qa6468d230936cb85@mail.gmail.com> <866398ue25.fsf@ds4.des.no> To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?= X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1077) Cc: Olivier Smedts , freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Gonzalo Nemmi Subject: Re: WITHOUT_TELNET=yes .. does it work? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 14:07:35 -0000 On 18 Nov 2009, at 14:01, Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav wrote: > Robert Watson writes: >> Olivier Smedts writes: >>> But someone (you, me...) can file a PR to add them to OLD_FILES when >>> WITHOUT_TELNET is set to yes, like it's done for some other WITHOUT_ >>> options. >> If it's done for other WITHOUT_ options, it's not obvious to me. >=20 > tools/build/mk/OptionalObsoleteFiles.inc >=20 > Poor placement IMHO, we shouldn't have dependencies from src into = tools. Its obscure location explains why it doesn't work. :-) Maybe it should = be src/OptionalFiles.inc? That said, it still sounds like a significant = maintenance problem to me: we have a lot of WITHOUT_ options, and they = may have non-trivial interactions... Robert=