Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2005 16:00:32 +0530 From: "Kamal R. Prasad" <kamalpr@gmail.com> To: Robert Watson <rwatson@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, Ulrich Spoerlein <q@galgenberg.net> Subject: Re: JFS2 on freebsd Message-ID: <ac7deb50509120330418db21e@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20050912101951.H33344@fledge.watson.org> References: <E1ECemU-0004dI-00.shmukler-mail-ru@f26.mail.ru> <ac7deb5050906082961c84a44@mail.gmail.com> <20050906191929.E78038@fledge.watson.org> <200509070215.j872FeQE040259@apollo.backplane.com> <20050907111035.B85520@fledge.watson.org> <200509071623.j87GNpal043201@apollo.backplane.com> <ac7deb50509080811183ccde6@mail.gmail.com> <20050909122506.K33344@fledge.watson.org> <20050912085455.GA1008@galgenberg.net> <20050912101951.H33344@fledge.watson.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> [snip] >=20 I think this is a useful approach for occasional file access, but I think > the general interest in the more interesting Linux file systems is for > less than occasional use. I.e., not just migration of data from Linux to > FreeBSD, but for daily use in production on high performance systems. I read up some info on JFS2 and it seems that it provides value in terms o= f=20 reliability/reoverability and low restart times -which is what carrier class applications desire. Ericsson Inc has deployed= =20 the linux port of jfs2 in its server room -and the results were worth the= =20 effort when compared to ufs. regards -kamal Robert N M Watson > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscribe@freebsd.org= " >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?ac7deb50509120330418db21e>