From owner-freebsd-hackers Sun Nov 2 19:31:28 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id TAA01417 for hackers-outgoing; Sun, 2 Nov 1997 19:31:28 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers) Received: from trojanhorse.ml.org (mdean.vip.best.com [206.86.94.101]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id TAA01404 for ; Sun, 2 Nov 1997 19:31:24 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jamil@trojanhorse.ml.org) Received: from localhost (jamil@localhost) by trojanhorse.ml.org (8.8.7/8.8.5) with SMTP id TAA01334; Sun, 2 Nov 1997 19:11:34 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 2 Nov 1997 19:11:34 -0800 (PST) From: "Jamil J. Weatherbee" To: Mike Smith cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 7400 gates effected by probe routine In-Reply-To: <199711030110.LAA00736@word.smith.net.au> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk I have a hunh about detecting using the tristate feature, but I have to test some things. My point is that it doesn't need to be the most important thing in the kernel, but when a developer with these kinds of needs goes looking for some state driven inputs, they don't need to go through what I had to and they know what products are supported. Will sending you one change your mind?