From owner-freebsd-hackers  Sat Nov  4 21:51:33 1995
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id VAA19918
          for hackers-outgoing; Sat, 4 Nov 1995 21:51:33 -0800
Received: from Root.COM (implode.Root.COM [198.145.90.17])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with ESMTP id VAA19913
          for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Sat, 4 Nov 1995 21:51:31 -0800
Received: from corbin.Root.COM (corbin [198.145.90.50]) by Root.COM (8.6.12/8.6.5) with ESMTP id VAA01434; Sat, 4 Nov 1995 21:51:30 -0800
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by corbin.Root.COM (8.6.12/8.6.5) with SMTP id VAA00825; Sat, 4 Nov 1995 21:48:58 -0800
Message-Id: <199511050548.VAA00825@corbin.Root.COM>
To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
cc: hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: More nits 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 04 Nov 95 21:35:35 PST."
             <432.815549735@time.cdrom.com> 
From: David Greenman <davidg@Root.COM>
Reply-To: davidg@Root.COM
Date: Sat, 04 Nov 1995 21:48:58 -0800
Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk

>> Just to point out that detaching userconfig() would be _very_ simple; if
>> anyone wants diffs to add a NOUSERCONFIG option I'll happily produce them.
>
>I'm reluctant to break things with 2.1 about to happen in about 4 days
>here (yes, really!).

   It should definately NOT go into 2.1. ...and by the time it matters for 2.2,
we may very well have a different framework entirely.

-DG