From owner-freebsd-current  Tue Oct  8 23:17:51 2002
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id DFDBC37B401; Tue,  8 Oct 2002 23:17:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailman.zeta.org.au (mailman.zeta.org.au [203.26.10.16])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 6FA8E43E75; Tue,  8 Oct 2002 23:17:48 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from bde@zeta.org.au)
Received: from bde.zeta.org.au (bde.zeta.org.au [203.2.228.102])
	by mailman.zeta.org.au (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id QAA14233;
	Wed, 9 Oct 2002 16:17:31 +1000
Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2002 16:27:36 +1000 (EST)
From: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>
X-X-Sender: bde@gamplex.bde.org
To: Peter Wemm <peter@wemm.org>
Cc: obrien@FreeBSD.ORG, John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.ORG>,
	Alexander Kabaev <ak03@gte.com>, <current@FreeBSD.ORG>,
	Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject: Re: i386 tinderbox failure 
In-Reply-To: <20021008231042.247562A88D@canning.wemm.org>
Message-ID: <20021009162539.B4060-100000@gamplex.bde.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <freebsd-current.FreeBSD.ORG>
List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive)
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=subscribe%20freebsd-current>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=unsubscribe%20freebsd-current>
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

On Tue, 8 Oct 2002, Peter Wemm wrote:

> "David O'Brien" wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 08, 2002 at 03:55:36PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
> > > Could you please just commit this on the vendor branch if it is the
> > > ...
> > Doing this screws up diffs to vendor source as there won't be a tag that
> > corisponds with this across all files.  For small contribed things that
> > is OK.  But when doing large ones it the following import+merge becomes
> > harder.
>
> While that is true, it usually isn't all that big a deal if you are careful
> and keep track of what you've done.  It is certainly better than causing
> the file to leave the vendor branch for something you *know* is now in the
> vendor tree.  And I think its better than leaving a known 'compiler crash'
> case there to bite developers.

It doesn't bite me.  What am I doing wrong? :-)  I just turned of the
-mcpu=pentiumpro pessimization before it affected anything.

Bruce


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message