From owner-freebsd-questions Tue Jan 10 03:11:17 1995 Return-Path: questions-owner Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) id DAA09917 for questions-outgoing; Tue, 10 Jan 1995 03:11:17 -0800 Received: from desiree.teleport.com (desiree.teleport.com [192.108.254.11]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) with ESMTP id DAA09911 for ; Tue, 10 Jan 1995 03:11:16 -0800 From: bmk@dtr.com Received: (from uucp@localhost) by desiree.teleport.com (8.6.9/8.6.9) with UUCP id DAA29195; Tue, 10 Jan 1995 03:11:04 -0800 Received: (from bmk@localhost) by dtr.com (8.6.9/8.6.9) id CAA26155; Mon, 9 Jan 1995 02:09:07 -0800 Message-Id: <199501091009.CAA26155@dtr.com> Subject: Re: SLIP vs PPP To: eblood@winky.reno.nv.us (Eric Blood) Date: Mon, 9 Jan 1995 02:09:06 -0800 (PST) Cc: questions@FreeBSD.org In-Reply-To: <199501100530.VAA07007@heather.greatbasin.com> from "Eric Blood" at Jan 8, 95 10:06:51 pm Reply-To: bmk@dtr.com X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 626 Sender: questions-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > I've been unable to resolve me earlier problem with my SLIP connection. Before > I do switch to PPP, does PPP work in 2.0? I vaguely remember that there was > some problem and that people should wait. Is this true? Are there any patches > if this is the case? It does work under 2.0R. There were some problems with panics and spontaneous reboots, but there's a one line patch that fixes it. I applied the patch two weeks ago and have had zero problems since. It's so reliable now, SOMETHING must be wrong.. :) If you can't find the patch anywhere, send me some mail and I'll see if I can find it in my archives.