From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 24 18:10:05 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B78716A41B; Sun, 24 Feb 2008 18:10:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from obrien@NUXI.org) Received: from dragon.nuxi.org (trang.nuxi.org [74.95.12.85]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1BF413C4EA; Sun, 24 Feb 2008 18:10:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from obrien@NUXI.org) Received: from dragon.nuxi.org (obrien@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dragon.nuxi.org (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id m1OIA4TE022935; Sun, 24 Feb 2008 10:10:04 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien@dragon.nuxi.org) Received: (from obrien@localhost) by dragon.nuxi.org (8.14.2/8.14.1/Submit) id m1OIA4d7022934; Sun, 24 Feb 2008 10:10:04 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien) Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2008 10:10:04 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" To: Ruslan Ermilov , "Dag-Erling C. Smorgrav" , Joseph Koshy , current@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20080224181004.GC21162@dragon.NUXI.org> Mail-Followup-To: obrien@freebsd.org, Ruslan Ermilov , "Dag-Erling C. Smorgrav" , Joseph Koshy , current@freebsd.org References: <20080221143351.GP57756@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <20080221152549.GB21518@team.vega.ru> <20080221173150.GA93693@dragon.NUXI.org> <20080222070728.GA56282@team.vega.ru> <20080222091642.GB57428@team.vega.ru> <20080222093234.GB17107@dragon.NUXI.org> <20080222102409.GD57428@team.vega.ru> <20080222105413.GD94607@team.vega.ru> <20080222170007.GA2622@plan0.kaiwan.csbnet.se> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080222170007.GA2622@plan0.kaiwan.csbnet.se> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 8.0-CURRENT User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) Cc: Subject: Re: [HEADS UP] ar(1) front-end committed. (notes for cross compile) X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: obrien@freebsd.org List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2008 18:10:05 -0000 On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 06:00:07PM +0100, Kai Wang wrote: > Would it be better if we call them gar and granlib? Solaris did > that. Also if I remember correctly, some ports probes gar. We also > call GNU make as gmake... Why do we want I don't like "gar" as that is pronounceable to the point I could easily see that being the real name of an existing program. Also, why do we want ports using gnu-ar specifically vs. what ever is our native 'ar'? If our native 'ar' isn't up to the task, we shouldn't be doing this endeavor at all. -- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org)