From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 25 11:21:57 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C6DF37B401 for ; Wed, 25 Jun 2003 11:21:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (trang.nuxi.com [66.93.134.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4651B43FDF for ; Wed, 25 Jun 2003 11:21:56 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from obrien@NUXI.com) Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (obrien@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h5PILlaQ020158; Wed, 25 Jun 2003 11:21:51 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from obrien@dragon.nuxi.com) Received: (from obrien@localhost) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id h5PILlRi020154; Wed, 25 Jun 2003 11:21:47 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2003 11:21:47 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" To: "Greg J." Message-ID: <20030625182147.GA15131@dragon.nuxi.com> References: <3EF72EDB.4030104@isi.edu> <20030623110939.0cd55713.xcas@cox.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030623110939.0cd55713.xcas@cox.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.1-CURRENT Organization: The NUXI BSD Group X-Pgp-Rsa-Fingerprint: B7 4D 3E E9 11 39 5F A3 90 76 5D 69 58 D9 98 7A X-Pgp-Rsa-Keyid: 1024/34F9F9D5 cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: audigy 2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: obrien@freebsd.org List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2003 18:21:57 -0000 On Mon, Jun 23, 2003 at 11:09:39AM -0700, Greg J. wrote: > Yuriy Tsibizov wrote: > > > Old driver (emu10k1.c) was too big for me to work on it and was > > difficult to add MIDI support. I know that my driver will never go > > into the tree - sound@ decided to use Orlando Bassotto's work. His > > driver is much closer to original emu10k1.c that mine. > > How about making a 'emu10k2' driver for just audigy 2.. and leaving the current 'emu10k1' alone? I think that is a hack as the two seem to be simular enough there should be a single driver. Now I'm not a sound driver guy at all, so maybe the HW interface is different enough to warent that. I wish someone with more clue than I would charge forward and commit some of the patches running around. :-(