Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 20 Aug 2021 09:19:02 +0000
From:      bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To:        doc@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   [Bug 257964] snp(4) manual page is out of sync with the device implementation on 12.2
Message-ID:  <bug-257964-9@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D257964

            Bug ID: 257964
           Summary: snp(4) manual page is out of sync with the device
                    implementation on 12.2
           Product: Documentation
           Version: Latest
          Hardware: Any
                OS: Any
            Status: New
          Severity: Affects Only Me
          Priority: ---
         Component: Manual Pages
          Assignee: bugs@FreeBSD.org
          Reporter: bsdpr@phoe.frmug.org
                CC: doc@FreeBSD.org

This bug report about the snp(4) manual page is a follow-up to a question I
asked in freebsd-hackers:
https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-hackers/2021-August/000216.html

1. The description of the device is inaccurate: in "allows users to attach =
to
any tty and watch activities on it", the plural on "activities" led me to t=
hink
that we could snoop on bidirectional traffic. Instead it should be made cle=
ar
that we can only snoop on egress streams, ie. data originating from the hos=
t.

2. Special values mentioned for the FIONREAD ioctl() are no longer used, in
snp.c none of those symbols are actually present. They should be removed fr=
om
the manual page as well as "This version of snp does not return proper error
codes when calling FIONREAD" in the BUGS section. These symbols could howev=
er
still be mentioned as being obsolete in the HISTORY section.

3. Today, disappearance, closure and detachment of the snooped device are n=
ow
signaled by an EIO return on read() and by an EIO or ENXIO return on write(=
).
This should be documented.

4. There is no handling of overflow as it used to be. Quoting the source co=
de:
"Right now we don't support any form of flow control". This should be
documented.

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.=



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-257964-9>